Skip to content

Benchmark Report

This report provides the representative benchmark snapshot currently maintained to support the whitepaper’s performance narrative. It is not a replacement for the full methodology.

Report purpose

First answer whether the result scale looks relevant to your workload, then decide whether you need to go deeper into scripts, method, or raw artifacts.

Representative results

The following results come from the maintained representative scenario: 100K reads, 150 bp, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, Release build.

WorkloadRepresentative resultMeaning
FASTQ reading path1696 MB/sParsing and ingest throughput
FASTQ writing path1.76M reads/sOutput-stage throughput
Combined filtering path1.67M reads/sRepresentative throughput under a multi-predicate QC workflow
Full statistics path302 MB/sEnd-to-end statistics collection capability

How to read it together with the whitepaper

  • Return to Performance for the evidence framing around these numbers.
  • Read alongside Architecture to judge whether the results align with the execution model.
  • Continue to the Benchmark Guide when you need method detail.

Method reminder

These numbers are maintained representative snapshots, not guaranteed values for every environment. Storage, compression, thread count, predicate combinations, and input distribution can all change the final throughput.

MIT License © LessUp